Pages

Sunday, May 22, 2011

Free stuff on Integral Life

Finally figured out how to find the free stuff and post direct links to all the free stuff on Integral Life. Ive got an account but I hate finding stuff that I cant share.

Feel weird sending people to things that they have to pay for on their first trip to Integral Land. Might give them the wrong idea.

Want people to check out the large chunk of free stuff first and then decide if they want to create an account.

There is a whole bunch of stuff up there that is free. Did I say FREE? No strings attached.

Really no strings..... Except.... If you watch, hear, read, learn all the free stuff. Let go of your ego for a little while and open your mind. Then decide. You just might... want more. Thats your decision. Your choice. Enjoy.

So here are quick links that presort the archive for free listings of some very amazing content



Videos


Audio

E+Learning


Articles

Art

Series

Saturday, May 14, 2011

Lady Gagas Essay

Lady Gagas Essay

Stefani Germanotta = Lady Gaga


The Tisch School of Arts at NYU

This is part of her essay


Stefani Germanotta

November 1, 2004

Assignment # 4: Reckoning of Evidence

The terms of the human body, some might say, are determined through a theoretical dissection of both the private environments and public atmospheres in which we live. By terms, the rules and evaluations of bodily condition, I mean to establish a division of perception. The first divide is that of the social body, the perception of our bodies in relation to a larger intellectual and sexual community, one that views each other in groups. The second divide is the condition of our nature, a perception of the body without relation or comparison, a singular entity that is independent, formless, and free. This segregation of seeing is general and yet universal because it capitalizes our differences. By examining these seeming generalizations, we break them down. It is through a demolition and reconstruction of these concepts that we can assign specificity and reason to these ways in which we look.

It is in the freeing of both natural and artificial bodies that art is created. For while some artist’s depend on the predisposition of their subjects to provide the work with it’s primary message and meaning, other artists rely on a temporal and physical freedom„an ability to use objects while also freeing them of their social significance and thus endowing them with endless possibilities of form. Spencer Tunick, an installations artist and photographer, struggled to achieve this freedom as a working artist in New York City. This artist is most famous for his installations, often characterized by masses of naked people arranged together in domestic locations, and in countries from every continent of the world. Removed of sexual implication or intention, the nudes are used primarily and only as intended by the artist, as an exploration of the shape, contour, and texture of the naked body. Spencer is fascinated by the metamorphosis of the human body into a form, and the effect that his chosen locations have on this new shape (and vice versa) . In this way, the naked bodies are Spencer’s clay, and he uses them in the same manner that a painter uses oils or a sculptor uses marble.

This way that the artist looks at the body, is a radical contradiction to Western society’s view of the nakedness. In the eyes of some of his critics, Spencer’s work invades social privacy not only through the art, which to them degrades the sacredness of the body by exposing it in mass nudity, but also in the making of his art which requires an abnormal amount of public nudity, indecent exposure. Tunick challenges traditional ideas of intimacy, and asks us to free the body of sexuality and view it aesthetically for the purpose of his art. The social body cannot exist, most specifically in the nude, as anything other then a sexual thing. This is our naked condition.

The analysis of form, while an engaging arc to follow, can also reveal an inverse exploration of the body. An examination of the deformed. This word, Michel de Montaigne addresses in his essay Of A Monstrous Child, suggesting that the existence of a social body is formless, but far from free. He describes the figure of a boy, below the breast he was fastened and stuck to another child, without a head, and with his spinal canal stopped up, the rest of his body being entire ( Lopate 57). Montaigne paints for us, a portrait of the boy’s physical form, or rather his de-form. With fastened, stuck, and stopped as his verbal interpretation of a Siamese twin, he illustrates how a human body, or form, can possess a lack of freedom in that it is harnessed to its disabilities in a physical way. For the deformed, there is an ownership of one’s difference, an ownership that is visible and undisputable. Through a scenic description of a deformed child, Montaigne uses the different shapes and contours of the child’s deformed body in order to create a visual contrast between what is ordinary and what is unordinary.

The perceptions of the nude and the deformed both manifest out of a concept of the social body, and the ideological contrast and visible conflict that is created in their presence. In Of A Monstrous Child, Montaigne asks us to consider the way we look at the body, and at each other. Montaigne suggests:

What we call monsters are not so to God, who sees in the immensity of his work the infinity of forms that he has comprised in it; and it is for us to believe that this figure that astonishes us is related and linked to some other figure of the same kind unknown to man. (58)

When we view something contrary to custom we assign them a monstrous quality. We infer based on something’s lack of ordinariness that it is disgusting or somehow linked to something inhumane, in some cases one might say uncivilized. In light of Montaigne’s theory, that we assign the unordinary with a monstrous condition, we can see the viewpoint from which art critics, the government, and the public, condemn Spencer Tunick’s work with naked bodies. Because it is not socially ordinary; it is irregular to see that many nudes amassed at one time„the art possesses a grotesque quality for the viewer.

This assigned foreignness can be designated as a kind of artistic racism, a public perception that handicaps from seeing and experiencing different forms, whether artistic or natural. There is an error in our perception„that our perception of the human body is somehow flawed. We call contrary to nature what we call contrary to custom (Lopate 58) We are trained only to be accepting of the regular, and it is this blindness that prevents us from seeing the prodigy in that which we have never seen before.

It is possible that in our naked form, in our deformed, that we are not only exposing our vulnerability, our skin, our scars, our flaws, and our genitals. But we also are exposing our secrets.

In spite of Montaigne’s great idealism, this perspective that allows us to choose the way in which we view the body, there is still an unavoidable clause that needs analyses. Sexuality manifests most physically

The AikiWeb Papers by Ross Robertson

Articles that my former Aikido Sensei Ross A. Robertson wrote and is still writing. He has several great writings at aikiweb. I still go back to them often.

Strange saying former because despite the fact that I no longer train with him physically. Due to time, my current priority's in life, and transportation constraints. He will always be my Sensei.

The experience of training and learning from Sensei Robertson will last a life time, who knows maybe even longer. His teachings, perspectives, way of life have always inspired me and continue to. Very much outside of the traditional martial arts box yet at the same time traditional. You could say he includes and transcends the traditional.

The AikiWeb Papers by Ross Robertson

Early in 2004, Jun Akiyama of AikiWeb asked several people if they would be interested in contributing monthly columns to his web site. I was privileged to be among those asked. Since then, I have written a submission for each month of publication.

AikiWeb is arguably the web's most important watering hole for anyone interested in aikido and all things aiki. Writing about aikido is difficult -- rather like the proverbial "dancing about architecture" (which I've never really thought was a bad idea, so much as conceptually challenging). I would like to say that in my writing I've found a flow that embodies the experience of aikido at its best, for both author and reader. In reality, while at times I've hit a nice zone, the articles referenced below reveal how complex, awkward, and painful, simplicity and effortlessness can be.

All article links in this section will take you to AikiWeb.

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

What Integral Is Not

What Integral Is Not:

When I first started learning what Integral was. I was aware of and looking for bullshit.
My first introduction to Integral was an amazing audio interview of
Ken Wilber by Tami Simon of Sounds True.

http://www.soundstrue.com/shop/Kosmic-Consciousness/468.productdetails

Check out Sounds True - http://www.soundstrue.com/ - Amazing collection of amazing stuff.
Of course the title turned me off a little. Kosmic is a word that seems to be used by strange people. However I let go of my ego and judgment. I listened. I was fascinated but not yet sold. Cant say that Im sold now. Can say that I believe. Not unconditional belief or faith. A belief based on objective research and the type of people involved with Integral. Oh... and Ive become somewhat confident in my ability to sort out bullshit from non bullshit.

Research that I have done over the past 6 years. Watching tons videos, reading articles, listening to interviews, and reading several Integral and non Integral books that have pushed my intellectual boundaries. To weigh and balance the concepts and ideas presented. Another thing that I pay close attention to is the actions of those at the top of the Integral movement. Seeing how their character fits their philosophy. As we all know many people claiming to have most of the answers to things have a tendency to be fake and untrustworthy.

Trust me Im always on the lookout for bullshit.
However Im not attached to finding bullshit. hehee.

My own worries from the beginning
Is this anything like a cult, Est, Dianetics, Scientology, or an extremist religion. I set my bullshit radar on high alert throughout all my studies. No bullshit found so far. After 6 years I still think the core of Integral Theory is solid. Im sure that there are those out there that take Integral too far.
One thing that Ive heard often from Integral Theory and its proponents is that Integral Theory is just a map. It is not the territory. So it inherently recognizes that the map may need to be changed, updated, adapted, to the territory and to the times.

Integral is not something that thinks it has all the answers. It has a lot of answers but it knows that it does not have them all.

Its more about how to find as many answers as it can and then sort them out while finding which ones have values that we can all agree on.

Thanks to

Ken Wilber
Tami Simon
Stuart Davis
Fred Kofman
My first influences and teachers of Integral Theory.

Jarrad Connor

Saturday, May 7, 2011

An Integral Perspective of MMA

The idea is to apply Integral Theory and Spiral Dynamics to all aspects of MMA. The process of training, building a fighter to become a champion, advertising, getting sponsors, design, promotion, changing the image of MMA that most see. In all actuality I do not think that I would have ever gotten into MMA if I had not studied Integral Theory and Spiral Dynamics. I want to evolve the sport with all the tools that Integral Theory and Spiral Dynamics have to offer. Plus I will not forget the things that I have learned from Fred Kofman, Brian Johnson, Michael Strong, and Jeff Klein. The ideology of Conscious Business is deep in my heart. On of my major goals is to tie MMA to more social causes and use its popularity to gather the attention and funding of the masses to things in the world that are making the world better. I look forward to sharing ideas and thoughts.

An Integral Perspective of MMA - Facebook group
http://www.facebook.com/#!/home.php?sk=group_144568918944694&ap=1


Links

David Mayeda

Fighting for Acceptance: Mixed Martial Artists and Violence in American Society [Paperback]

David Mayeda (Author), David Ching (Contributor)

http://mmacademics.angelfire.com/

http://www.amazon.com/Fighting-Acceptance-Martial-Violence-American/dp/0595478913

http://thegrumpysociologist.blogspot.com/

Dr. Randy Borum

http://combatsportpsychology.blogspot.com/

The Fighter’s Mind – Inside The Mental Game

Sam Sheridan

http://worldismadeoffire.com/

Dr. Don Beck

http://www.spiraldynamics.net/

Integral Institute

http://www.integralinstitute.org/

Flow Idealism

http://www.flowidealism.org/

Axialent

Conscious Business

http://www.axialent.com/

Working for GOOD

Jeff Klein

http://www.causealliancemarketing.com/

Brian Johnson - Arete

http://www.philosophersnotes.com/

David Meggyesy

Out of Their League

http://www.amazon.com/Out-Their-League-Dave-Meggyesy/dp/0803283148


Shawn Phillips

http://www.youtube.com/user/PhillipsPerformance